How to Audit Your School Library's Real Impact (Without Getting Lost in Statistics)
- Sep 15
- 5 min read

After my last post about teachers accidentally doing librarians' jobs, several headteachers asked: "How do I actually know if my library service is working effectively?"
Fair question. You can't manage what you don't measure, but most library evaluations focus on circulation statistics and user satisfaction surveys that don't tell you what you really need to know: Is this service making my school more efficient and effective?
Here's a practical audit framework, adapted from the IFLA School Library Guidelines, that focuses on what actually matters for school leadership.
1. Staff Integration and Professional Development
What to look for:
Is your librarian actively involved in curriculum planning meetings, not just ordering books?
Do teachers regularly collaborate with the librarian on project design and assessment?
Is the librarian contributing to your school's digital strategy and AI policy development?
Red flags:
The librarian only finds out about projects after they've been assigned
Teachers are developing their own research skill lessons repeatedly across departments
Your digital literacy strategy doesn't mention the library service
Why this matters: If your librarian isn't integrated into curriculum planning, you're paying for a reactive service instead of proactive educational support.
2. Curriculum Integration
Key questions to ask:
Can your librarian tell you how their work connects to specific learning objectives in different subjects?
Are media and information literacy skills being taught systematically across Years 7-10, or are they being retaught for every project?
How well prepared are your older students for Extended Essays and EPQ work that requires sophisticated research methodology?
Is there evidence that students' inquiry and evaluation skills improve as they progress through school?
Look for:
Library collaboration is mentioned in department planning documents and schemes of work
Assessment rubrics that include information evaluation criteria
Students are using increasingly sophisticated sources and methods as they advance
Budget impact: Systematic skill development means less teacher time spent on repetitive instruction and better student outcomes on analytical tasks.
3. Resource Effectiveness
Beyond circulation statistics - ask:
Are books being selected strategically to support curriculum needs and reading development, not just popular demand?
Can teachers identify how specific library resources have enhanced their lessons or supported struggling readers?
Are digital resources being used strategically, or are students still defaulting to Google or AI for everything?
Does the librarian provide training on specialist databases and tools that teachers wouldn't know about?
Evidence of effectiveness:
Teachers can point to specific books or resources that have made a difference to student understanding
Students demonstrate awareness of different source types and their appropriate uses
Reading for pleasure initiatives show measurable impact on literacy levels
Resource spending connects to curriculum priorities rather than just general popularity
4. Technology and AI Integration
Current priorities:
When your school is ready to integrate AI, does the librarian possess the critical thinking and information evaluation expertise to contribute meaningfully to policy discussions?
Are students learning the foundational inquiry skills they'll need to use AI tools effectively?
Does the library provide access to tools and training that individual teachers couldn't provide alone?
Questions for your librarian:
What critical thinking skills are you already teaching that would help students evaluate any information source, including AI-generated content?
How could your expertise in source evaluation contribute when we're ready to develop our approach to AI use?
What specific inquiry skills are you teaching that help students ask better questions and think more critically?
5. Impact on Teacher Workload
Measure this:
Are teachers co-teaching inquiry skills with the librarian, learning techniques they can then apply independently?
Do teachers report gaining new skills through library collaboration that improve their teaching across multiple classes?
Is there evidence that inquiry skills knowledge is spreading across departments through library-supported professional development?
Are teachers referring students to the librarian for specialised support while maintaining their own classroom teaching?
Calculate the value:
If the librarian co-teaches with five teachers per term, those teachers gain skills they can use with all their classes
Teacher confidence in supporting inquiry-based learning increases through collaboration rather than just handover
Students benefit from both subject expertise and information literacy expertise in the same lesson
Knowledge spreads through departments as teachers share what they've learned from library collaboration
Look for a support network approach: The librarian provides overview and coordination while teachers become more skilled at supporting inquiry in their own classrooms. This multiplies the impact beyond what one person could achieve alone.
6. Student Outcomes Beyond Test Scores
Look for evidence that students:
Can articulate why they chose specific sources for projects
Show progression in the complexity of sources they can handle
Demonstrate better analytical skills in subjects that require evaluation and synthesis
Are prepared for the inquiry and information demands of further education, apprenticeships, and the workplace
Warning signs:
Students consistently use low-quality or inappropriate sources
Project work shows little evidence of information evaluation skills
Sixth-form teachers report students struggling with inquiry methodology
Reading levels across the school aren't improving despite other interventions
Students lack the critical thinking skills employers increasingly value
7. Budget Value Assessment
Calculate your return on investment:
Teacher time saved through library collaboration
Improved project outcomes across multiple subjects
Enhanced preparation for work or post-16 education
Contribution to whole-school digital strategy
Compare costs:
What would it cost to train all teachers in information literacy, inquiry learning, and critical thinking development?
How much would external consultancy cost for developing policies for Academic Integrity, digital and AI or Reading and literacy?
What's the opportunity cost of teachers spending time on tasks outside their expertise?
Your Audit Action Plan
Week 1: Interview three teachers from different departments about how they handle inquiry skill development and are considering AI integration challenges.
Week 2: Review how library collaboration (or lack of it) appears in your latest curriculum planning documents.
Week 3: Calculate actual teacher time spent on tasks that could be library-supported.
Week 4: Assess whether your current library provision is solving the problems identified in weeks 1-3.
What Good Integration Actually Looks Like
Inquiry skills are taught systematically, not repeatedly
Teachers focus on subject content, while media and information literacy through inquiry is handled collaboratively
Students show clear progression in analytical and evaluation skills
Your digital strategy recognises library expertise as a valuable resource when you're ready to tackle AI integration
Budget discussions focus on educational impact, not just resource costs
The goal isn't to prove your library is perfect; it's to identify whether you're getting maximum educational value from this resource, and if not, what needs to change.
Next week, I'll explore how library provision directly connects to reading development and literacy outcomes - and why this might be the most important budget conversation you're not having.
I help schools conduct these audits and develop strategies for maximising library service effectiveness. If you'd like support reviewing your current provision or developing better integration strategies, I'd be happy to discuss your specific context.





Comments